Happy Ending
Through the whole novel I think it is an up and down between whether we would see the book having a happy ending for its characters or not. In the beginning we have many hardships that happen such as Bingley leaving Netherfield never to return as well as Lydia running away with Wickham. But as the novel progresses I think that the happy endings start to fall into place for our main characters. Lydia eventually is found and we find out that she will indeed be married to Mr. Wickham, even if it is by force. Then, we hear that Mr. Bingley is returning to Netherfield, could it only be because of bird hunting? I think not. Within the first few days of his arriving her comes to Longbourn to visit the family. Soon after, Jane and Bingley are engaged to be married. Now, Elizabeth has a very rough time through the whole novel, till she gets to her happy ending at the very end of the book. In the end, Elizabeth most definitely does get her happy ending by marrying her love, Mr. Darcy, but she did not always feel this way for him.
In the beginning we see Elizabeth thinking of Mr. Darcy as being a very disagreeable man; she thinks that he is terrible and very prideful. When Mr. Bingley leaves Netherfield for the first time she seems extremely happy because she thinks that she will never have to see him again, Mr. Darcy having no reason to stay in the country when his whole party leaves to go back to the north. Yet, when she is visiting Mr. Collins and his new wife Charlotte, she comes into contact with him again.
Then, when Mr. Darcy first proposes to Elizabeth she has no problem in explaining to him all the reasons that she finds him disagreeable. The first being that he took Bingley away from his sister on purpose. She also states that she dislikes him first and foremost because of the way that he mistreated Mr. Wickham. After this little affair took place, Darcy brought it upon himself to write a letter to Elizabeth explaining the reasoning behind what happened with Wickham as well as explaining why he took leave of Netherfield and told Bingley not to come back. Well, after reading this Elizabeth started to understand Mr. Darcy a little bit better. After she read the part containing the information against Wickham’s character she thought back and tried to find any “distinguished trait of integrity or benevolence” in him, yet she could not (141).
After Elizabeth read the letter that Darcy had written her, and she started to get a sense for his true character, I think that she started to warm up to him. All of the things that she disliked about him before, were wiped away because of the new information that was given to her. As time went on, and Elizabeth goes on her journey with her aunt and uncle to Pemberley herself, she started to warm up to Darcy more and more. At the end of the novel, when Lady Catherine came to see Elizabeth at Longbourn and told her that she had to promise that she would never marry her nephew, Elizabeth flat out said that she “will make no promise of the kind” (243). I think after saying this we know for sure that Elizabeth does love Mr. Darcy. A few days later who should show up to Longbourn but Mr. Darcy himself! He said that Lady Catherine had indeed ran into him on her way back home and told him of how unreasonable Elizabeth had been when she encountered her about the whole marriage incident. To her despair, these exclamations to him, “taught me to hope” said Darcy to Elizabeth (249). After this was exchanged, Elizabeth was then engaged to marry Darcy. After Darcy talked to Mr. Bennet and Elizabeth talked to her mother and father it was arranged that they would be married.
All in all, I think that the main Bennet women were very happy with how their fates ended up. Jane was very happy with being Mrs. Bingley and Elizabeth was finally very happy to end up being Mrs. Darcy. Mrs. Bennet was very happy that she had three daughters out of the house, and I think having Mrs. Bennet being in good spirits greatly helped Mr. Bennet. Kitty ended up visiting her more privileged sisters, and was introduced to men that would be good for her in the long run. She was unable to visit Lydia because her father thought that Lydia would be a very bad influence on her character. Mary stayed and home and seemed to be pleased with not being around gentleman all together. The only person who seemed to have a hard time at the end of the novel was Lydia. She was constantly asking her sister for money because she now had some, being Mrs. Darcy and all. It was also said that they often moved from place to place because of Wickham and that “his affection for her soon sunk into indifference; hers lasted a little longer” (263). Although this may sound mean, I do believe that Lydia deserved everything that happened to her, if she was going to be a flirt and run away with a man, then she deserved to have him not love her in the end and have her situation not be as good as her eldest sisters.





falsehoods” (237). The commitment between Mr. Darcy and Miss de Bourgh is explained to Elizabeth by Lady Catherine: “‘The engagement between them is of a peculiar kind. From their infancy, they have been intended for each other. It was the favourite wish of his mother, as well as of hers. While in their cradles, we planned the union: and now, at the moment when the wishes of both sisters would be accomplished, in their marriage, to be prevented by a young woman of inferior birth, of no importance in the world, and wholly unallied to his family!’” (238). Mr. Darcy and Miss de Bourgh have clearly been raised knowing they are expected to marry one another. Lady Catherine goes on to state that the two are “destined” for one another. An expectation of the impending union exists, and yet, there is clearly fear – based on Lady Catherine’s unexpected visit – that the marriage is not set in stone.
brings up a very interesting question: what happens if technology can do absolutely everything for us, and humans no longer have to do any of the work? We become lazy and devolved (into two separate species depending on your line of work before the great technological advances), at least according to Wells, and I think he’s right. After all, how many of us know how to code? Yet we use various websites every day. Again, not many of us do math by hand when it’s a lot easier to grab a calculator, and I don’t know about you, but I’m slowly forgetting how to do long handed math to find the answers because of it. Technology may be convenient, and even great in some ways, but in other ways, it makes us inherently lazy and less motivated to do things for ourselves. As a consequence, people forget things, and learn less because they can easily just be googled, or things of the past become obsolete-like language and culture. Because of this, the lessons that made us better humans are forgotten. No one still reads Plato, Shakespeare, or Locke. They no longer care about great Greek literature or the Rights of Man. They just care about the basic needs: food, sex, and sleep. What else would they need in a world without crime, disease, or social issues? Even though this novel is Science Fiction, therefore extremely far fetched, I think that it brings up some valid issues about technology, especially in how lazy it has made us, and will continue to do so. This is an issue that I think is even more prevalent in today’s society that Wells would have thought when he first wrote The Time Machine. Even though technological advancement may not lead to loss of humanity completely, and we may not lose language as a whole, it would not be unfathomable to think one day there could be a universal language while we all sit behind computers/various other technology that we have no idea how they work to talk to one another.

it is taking away from the need for people to actually think. I believe that as a species we need to strive to overcome obstacles to improve, when everything is provided for you people tend to become lazy. There are those who would still study or build new inventions if we lived in a world where the pursuit of money wasn’t a determining factor on a persons life. I just feel that as technology improves and makes things easier those who just take advantage of the benefits without trying to understand how or why something works are only hurting themselves in the long run.
I really enjoy the idea of time travel, however I don’t believe it will ever be possible it is a great thing to write a book about. I like how the travelers’ guests actually question what he is saying he is doing. A lot of book I’ve read the characters don’t question what is happening around them. I have never thought about language being unnecessary. Also mentioned is the bending of human intelligence to make life easier. Today we are currently doing all things to make life easier you see it in our cell phones, computers and at work. We use machines to do things that in the past people did. Some say that one day the world will be run by robots and machines it is a crazy idea but some could say that it already is, we rely on the internet and technology for everyday life. People would go crazy if they lost all technology. Even in prisons people have access to technology. The outcome of all the technology advances could become a weakness in society. “Under the new conditions of perfect comfort and security that restless energy, that with us is strength, would become weakness” (Wells, 33) I do not think that the advances in technology could take away feelings and make people heartless. Humans are biologically wired to want a mate and raise children. The Morlocks and the Elois in my opinion resembles the working class and the upper class. The lower class take care of the dirty work.

















a cultural aspect of historical London, is still within it’s culture in the modern era. I’m sure that with the success of the film version of Sweeney Todd starring Johnny Depp there is a cult following standing in front of the clock and walking through the Bell Yard and Fleet Street retracing both Tobias’ and Todd’s footsteps throughout London. Hopefully with our help in digitalizing this version of the story we will make
it an easier journey.
like this, everything sounds so utilitarian. Sure, you may still have access to your wants and needs, according to the book, but the book looks at the population as one solid entity. No one has their own strong personality or really stands out in the crowd. There’s no separation, and human beings strive to be noticed, but in 2000 Boston, they all blend together.







near the River Thames, which allows readers to infer that Sweeney Todd’s shop is frequented by both citizens of London and visitors to the city. The barber’s first victim – that readers are aware of – is a stranger to London: “There was a small crowd collected opposite the church, for the figures were about to strike three-quarters past six; and among that crowd was one man who gazed with as much curiosity as anybody at the exhibition” (4). Sweeney Todd’s shop is located within viewing distance of St. Dunstan’s clock. The story is set in 1785, but was published in 1850; the clock was rebuilt in 1831, and as discussed in class, it wasn’t even there when the story was written. The clock is described as a landmark in the text, and as a result of the location of the barber shop, Sweeney Todd is able to pick out his victims by observing the ways in which they admire the clock. The more a person stares at the landmark, the more likely he or she is a tourist. Ultimately, the layout of the city is critical to the text’s narrative. As a physical space, the story stays true to the physical representation of London in 1785.
created by classmates allows one to see a visual representation of the precariousness of Sweeney Todd’s and Mrs. Lovett’s situation: the monsters of the story are situated at the heart of the story’s setting. They are engaging in criminal activity practically in front of those who can legally condemn them to a life of imprisonment, or possibly death. When considering the physical placement of the story’s villains, could the author be making a critique of London’s legal system, indicating that it is flawed?

, or read it after to understand the additional layers the author has placed on his/her story? As with many works of literature written by authors long dead, there isn’t the ability to contact the author and ask them just what they meant by the story.
According to Bellamy an ideal world is a socialist one and while the picture he paints does seem very nice there is still something just slightly off putting about it. For instance the thought that people work out of a sense of patriotism is just not believable. That is because if everyone was so patriotic it would make sense for there to be more wars due to the feeling that one lifestyle is the best and needs to be spread. Instead the world of Bellamy does not even contain an army to protect the people from attack even though it is stated that the entire world had not yet fallen under this system. The other is that rules were meant to be broken and people love to do so even if it is in small ways. This leads me to believe that on the surface everything is nice and people are deliriously happy but underneath there must be some form of thought police keeping the people complacent. If not than the 2000 that Bellamy described is one that I would not wish to live in since it has decidedly stepford like qualities. It is for this overly perfect reason that the novel has a slightly creepy vibe which makes reading it turn into a game of waiting for the other shoe to drop. The problem is it never does and so one is left feeling as though nothing was resolved and wondering what the point was.
laziness, narcissism, etc. Maybe they mentioned it and I missed it but I didn’t note anything about cops or laws. They mentioned some sort of minimal punishment for unsatisfying work, but what about conflicts. Another, things is wants compared to needs. Do they have vehicles, bikes or anything that could resemble one person being better than the other? It all comes back to loving luxury and wanting to be better and individual.


In both portraits I find the portrayal of Victoria to be very accurate and representative of the time. In the first portrait, Victoria is surrounded, appearing young and overwhelmed with her current position. In the latter, she is well-rounded and has seen it all. At least these specific images seem very realistic, to me.
well. After Catherine dances with Mr. Tilney for the first time, it is Mr. Allen’s responsibility to make sure Mr. Tilney is an acceptable match: “…for he had early in the evening taken pains to know who her partner was, and had been assured Mr. Tilney’s being a clergyman, and of a very respectable family in Gloucestershire” (13). Catherine has no idea whether or not Mr. Tilney is a socially respectable choice for a dance partner, and therefore, she depends on Mr. Allen to learn of his reputation among the other attendees. Catherine’s friend, Isabella, also helps our heroine navigate the rules of the ballroom by expressing how often one may dance with another: “‘He wants me to dance with him again, though I tell him it is a most improper thing, and entirely against the rules. It would make us the talk of the place, if we were not to change partners’” (35). This “rule” is one that Catherine had not been aware of, and she trusts Isabella’s judgment. To be the “talk of the place” is not something one wants because it can drive off potential suitors and possibly lead to a poor reputation; however, if one’s engagement to be married is the talk, then that’s perfectly acceptable. Without the assistance of Mr. Allen and Isabella, Catherine could have easily ended up being the gossip of the evening, and possibly have ruined her chances at meeting a respectable suitor.

germs and sanitation have a significant impact on the city structure. Keeping political influence out of it the city of Frankville is heavily influenced by biological discovery. The city has strict rules as far as houses having no wall paper or carpet as these can be breeding grounds for germs and disease. The houses are also heated with furnaces that pump their smoke not into the air but into other furnaces to clean the carbon out of the smoke to release steam into the air. These regulations help with the health of the citizens as statistics showed that Frankville had less than half the deaths of a typical city of its size.





Nationalism, somehow things always come back around to nationalism and for some reason it actually makes sense. What is meant by that it that the nationalistic views in this book are important to the plot and development of the novel. In fact nationalism seems to be the driving force especially since the professors motivations are to prove himself better than all others specifically his french competition. This concept is introduced very early in the book and from what has been read so far continues on throughout it. The thing is sometimes nationalism can kind of spoil things like in The Last Man however that does not seem to be the case here. In this novel everything is carefully thought out so that nationalism becomes such an ingrained part of the book that even the reader starts to feel it. The upside of this is that the nationalistic views are very firmly established as character traits rather than something the author is preaching about. Being a character trait also makes it in some senses a flaw because it is obvious that when one allows something like that to guide the course of ones life, like the professor is doing, it can get them into trouble. The novel is also set in a time where nationalism was a common theme in life and many people felt the everyday press of it. This makes Verne’s novel a realistic approach to nationalism that is serves to draw the reader further in rather than throw them off.

vestments.” When Unca is preparing to meet the islanders in person, she too wears vestments: “When the expected morning came, I awoke by day-break, drest myself in white, and over all, put on the high-priest’s vestments …” (121). Unca is preparing to become the instructor of the islanders’ religious practices and dresses the part. Her religious upbringing occurred in England during the early 17th century, and so she was most likely familiar with the ways in which the clergymen dressed. However, Unca tells the readers her reasons for dressing up in the “high-priest’s vestments,” and it has nothing to do with the religious practices she grew accustomed to in England: “Nor did I now thus adorn myself from pride; but I thought the extraordinary appearance that they would give me, might procure me a more favourable reception” (121). Her goal is to stop the islanders from praising a massive golden idol that represents the sun, and yet she dresses similarly to this golden idol; in addition to the vestments, she wears a gown sparkling with gems, a crown, bracelets and rings, and carries a golden staff with an image of the sun on it. Even though her ultimate intent is to spread Christianity, Unca turns herself into the islanders’ golden prophet by preying on their established preferences for golden idols.